Blog

Why Your Company's Communication is Failing: A Melbourne Consultant's Brutal Take

Three weeks ago, I watched a $2.3 million project collapse because the project manager thought "urgent" meant the same thing to everyone on her team.

That's when it hit me. After 18 years of running workplace training sessions across Australia, I've realised something that might make you uncomfortable: your company's communication isn't just poor—it's systematically broken. And the worst part? You probably think it's working fine.

Let me paint you a picture that's probably happening in your office right now. Sarah from accounting sends an email marked "URGENT" about updating expense forms. Meanwhile, James in operations is dealing with a safety incident he considers "urgent" but hasn't told anyone because he's waiting for the "right moment" in next Tuesday's team meeting. The disconnect isn't just annoying—it's dangerous.

The Australian Communication Paradox

Here's what I find fascinating about Australian workplaces. We pride ourselves on being straight shooters, right? "Tell it like it is" and all that. But when I dig into actual communication patterns during my training sessions, I find the opposite. We're masters of corporate speak that says nothing while appearing to say everything.

Take this gem I heard in a Brisbane office last month: "We need to leverage our synergistic capabilities to optimise stakeholder engagement outcomes." Translation? "We should probably talk to our customers more."

The problem isn't that Aussie workers can't communicate. It's that we've created systems that punish clear communication and reward bureaucratic waffle. When someone says what they actually mean, we call them "too direct" or "not being a team player."

Here's an unpopular opinion: direct communication isn't rude. It's efficient.

Why Modern Communication Training Misses the Mark

Most communication training programs focus on teaching people how to structure emails or run better meetings. That's like teaching someone to polish a broken watch. You're working on the wrong problem.

The real issue? Context collapse.

In the old days—and yes, I'm going to sound like someone's grandfather here—people worked in the same physical space, doing similar tasks, with shared understanding of what words meant. "Urgent" meant the building was on fire or the client was threatening to leave. Simple.

Now we've got remote teams spread across time zones, different departments using the same words to mean completely different things, and communication platforms that strip away 90% of human context. A thumbs-up emoji could mean "yes, proceed" or "I read this but have no opinion" or "I'm too busy to respond properly but don't want to seem rude."

The Three Communication Killers Nobody Talks About

1. The Assumption Trap

Everyone assumes everyone else shares their context. Last year, I worked with a Perth mining company where the phrase "end of day" meant 5 PM to office staff and 6 AM the next morning to night shift workers. Three months of confusion and missed deadlines before anyone thought to clarify.

2. Platform Proliferation

Teams, Slack, email, WhatsApp groups, project management tools, and that one person who still prefers phone calls. Important information gets scattered across seven different platforms, and nobody knows where to look for what. I've seen companies where finding a decision requires checking five different apps and asking three different people what happened in that meeting you weren't invited to.

3. The Feedback Vacuum

This one drives me mental. Companies spend thousands on communication tools and training, then create cultures where admitting you didn't understand something is seen as weakness. So people nod along in meetings, send vague responses to avoid looking stupid, and the whole system perpetuates itself.

Here's a confession: I used to be terrible at this myself. For years, I'd end training sessions by asking "Any questions?" and when nobody responded, I'd assume everything was crystal clear. Turns out, people don't ask questions when they think it makes them look incompetent. Rookie mistake from someone who should have known better.

What Actually Works (And Why You Won't Like It)

Start with radical transparency about confusion.

Make it safe—no, make it expected—for people to say "I don't understand" or "This doesn't make sense to me." At one of my client companies in Adelaide, they introduced a "confusion budget" where every team member was required to admit to not understanding something at least once per week. Sounds silly, but miscommunication incidents dropped by 60% in four months.

Kill the communication complexity.

Pick two platforms. Maximum. One for quick coordination, one for detailed discussion and documentation. I don't care if it's Teams and email or Slack and shared drives. But pick two and stick with them. Every additional platform increases communication failure exponentially.

Time-box everything.

Response times, meeting lengths, decision deadlines. Australians respond well to clear boundaries, but we need them spelled out. "Get back to me when you can" is communication cancer. "I need your input by Thursday 3 PM so we can finalise this by Friday" actually works.

The thing about communication is that it's not actually about the words we use. It's about shared understanding, context, and creating systems that support clarity rather than confusion.

The Hard Truth About Leadership Communication

Here's where I'm going to lose some of you.

Most communication problems in Australian companies start at the top. I've sat in boardrooms where executives complain about poor communication from their teams, then watched those same executives send contradictory directives, change priorities without explanation, and wonder why everyone seems confused.

Leaders set the communication culture, whether they realise it or not. If you're saying one thing in the all-hands meeting and something different in the leadership team WhatsApp group, don't be surprised when your staff seem perpetually out of step.

The solution isn't more advanced presentation skills training for your managers. It's consistency, context, and the radical idea that communication is a two-way process that requires actual listening.

Making It Practical

Start small. Pick one communication pain point that's costing you time or money right now. For most companies, it's one of these:

People not knowing who needs to be involved in decisions
Information living in someone's head instead of accessible systems
Meetings that should have been emails (or emails that should have been conversations)
Different teams using the same words to mean different things

Fix that one thing completely before moving to the next. I know it's tempting to overhaul everything at once, but communication change has to be gradual or it just creates more confusion.

And here's my final piece of advice: stop trying to make communication perfect. Aim for functional. Perfect communication is a myth that leads to paralysis. Functional communication gets things done and can be improved iteratively.

The companies that succeed at this aren't the ones with the most sophisticated systems or the most extensive training budgets. They're the ones that made it culturally acceptable to admit when communication isn't working and then actually do something about it.

Most companies won't do this work because it requires admitting that their current approach isn't working. It's easier to blame individuals for "not being good communicators" than to examine the systems that create communication failures.

But if you're still reading this, you might be different. And that gives me hope.

Further Resources: